IICJ Paper Safety Governance: Getting it Right Exercising effective safety governance across large, diverse corporations Immanuel Kemp, Business Analyst, Arthur D. Little, UK
Stephen Watson, Principal, Risk Practice, Arthur D. Little, UK

As companies become increasingly consolidated under the ownership of very large corporations, there is a growing challenge in exercising appropriate safety governance over their constituent businesses. This challenge is compounded by the wide range of available governance models from which to choose, an increasing diversity of operations, and the significant risk of reputational damage arising from poor safety performance by a business unit in which the parent corporation does not necessarily hold a controlling stake. Choosing an optimal approach for corporate safety governance is a critical decision for the board and the executive leadership team. This paper explores how to meet these challenges and to get safety governance right, by using a two-factor model, which characterises different styles of governance, and examines their relative advantages and disadvantages. This model has been applied in a benchmarking study of nine multinational corporations across a range of sectors to gain further insights into how safety governance is implemented in practice. The study, along with Arthur D. Little’s experience in these sectors, concludes that there is no universally optimal solution for safety governance, but selection of an approach needs to be based on a company’s specific circumstances. This paper explores how certain aspects of the chosen approach, the role of corporate leadership, and balance between corporate requirements and corporate intervention can influence the effectiveness of these different styles.
Author
Immanuel Kemp
Immanuel Kemp
Immanuel Kemp is a Business Analyst in Arthur D. Little’s Risk practice. His consulting work focuses on the transport sector, with particular interests in safety governance, risk assessment and modelling, and the development and delivery of safety training courses. He has an M.Eng in Chemical Engineering (First Class Honours) from the University of Cambridge and is an Associate Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.
Author
Stephen Watson
Stephen Watson
Stephen Watson is a Principal in Arthur D. Little's Risk practice based in Cambridge UK. He has 17 years of experience safety consulting to the transport, construction and process sectors both in the UK and internationally. His work chiefly focuses on s
Company
Arthur D. Little
Arthur D. Little is a leading international management consulting firms. We link strategy, innovation and technology in ways that master complex business challenges to deliver sustainable results for our clients. The Cambridge office is the home of the Ri
Country
United Kingdom More
Area of Law
Corporate Governance More
Business Sector
Consultant More
Month Published
July 2015 More
Edition
Vol. 8, No. 32, Summer 2015 More
    Go back to Library Search