The Psychology of Legal Innovation

June 2017Management Telecommunications

Abstract

Lawyers contain all of the latent creativity required to shape their personal and professional worlds. Unlocking that potential is a matter of expectation and exposition. Cost pressure and urgency have produced a narrow framing error in the way we think about legal innovation. The pressure to do more with less (and faster) is real, but the bigger picture involves a fundamental transformation in the means of production of legal knowledge and advice. The strategy for the future of legal must involve both incrementally innovating to solve the immediate pain point of cost and time pressure, and radically innovating to reimagine the way that law and lawyers create and preserve value for their clients. There are clear evidence based methods for creating the conditions for innovation. Telstra’s Legal Innovation Forum is examined as a case study of how to implement innovation within a legal team.

Subscribe to reador

Related Papers

The High Tech Team

It’s often said that change is the only constant in life. The legal profession is no exception to that rule! Over the last two decades, we have experienced significant growth...Read more

Louise Pentland

Former EVP and Chief Legal Officer of Nokia, None, USA

In-House Legal Counsel and Enterprise Risk Management

No investment can be effective in the long term without proper risk management, and the outcomes of inadequate risk management turned out to be expensive. So from a certain perspective...Read more

Zhang Jianbin

In-House Counsel, China Telecom, China

Telecommunications: The challenges of In-house Legal Departments in an environment of constant technology innovation and regulatory changes.

Law schools usually teach future lawyers to work based on a very important tool: case law, that is, the collection of reported cases and their decisions that throughout the years...Read more