This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy

International In-house Counsel Journal logoInternational In-house Counsel Journal logo
Back to library search

Why the 2011 America Invents Act is Bad for Entrepreneurs, Bad for Startups, and Bad for America-and How to Fix It

Abstract

Now that the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 (AIA) is law and is beginning to phase into effect, the patent community has begun to focus and understand what has happened. More and more attorneys are coming to recognize that the AIA will put entrepreneurs and startup companies in deep trouble. The reason? Despite recent data from the U.S. Census Bureau that shows that startups are responsible for all net job creation in the U.S. over the last 35 years, the AIA takes away much of the legal framework that allows American innovators—especially startups—to innovate, conduct research and development, and attract investors. Adding insult to injury, the AIA favors Fortune 150 companies by making it easier for them to accelerate the trend of their export of technical jobs. Let’s look at some of the problems, and then I’ll offer some proposals to fix the AIA.

Author

Portrait image of David Boundy
David Boundy
CEO, Cambridge Technology Law LLC, USA

David Boundy is Partner and CEO of Cambridge Technology Law LLC in Cambridge MA. Mr Boundy brings an in-house counsel's business-oriented perspective for intellectual property issues to clients of the firm, which include startups, established companies, and angel and venture investors. Mr. Boundy was formerly vice president for intellectual property and assistant general counsel for Cantor Fitzgerald in New York.

Company

Cambridge Technology Law LLC

Cambridge Technology Law LLC is a law firm headquartered in the heart of the high-tech district of Kendall Square, Cambridge MA, across the street from MIT. The firm specializes in intellectual property law, technology law, and administrative law. We help our clients in business matters, and we apply administrative law expertise in disputes with the Federal government, and on behalf of clients in inter partes proceedings within federal adjudication proceedings.

Related Papers

Trademarks in Mergers and Acquisitions
In many cases, when a company or business is acquired or where there is a merger of companies, the trade mark portfolio of the target company is ignored as unimportant....Read more
Portrait image of Su-Lin Ang
Su-Lin Ang
Head of Legal, Intellectual Property, Group Legal Department, Standard Chartered Bank, Singapore
Equity Derivatives
In this article we hope to provide a high level overview of how equity derivatives are used in the market as well as provide an insight into the variety of...Read more
Portrait image of Lisa Hutton
Lisa Hutton
Senior Legal Counsel, ING Bank N.V. , Netherlands
The distribution right and the principle of exhaustion through the Court of Justice of the EU case-law for tangible and digital works
The distribution right under copyright law, historically tied to tangible copies of works, has become an increasingly complex issue with the rise of digital and intangible works. In recent years,...Read more
Portrait image of Anthi Akritidou M.A., LL.M., PhD (C.),
Anthi Akritidou M.A., LL.M., PhD (C.),
Head of Legal and EU Affairs, International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations, Belgium
Who Owns The Rights in a Song: Evolving Trends in Music Copyright in India
It is trite to say that copyright is a bundle of rights. This truism is best demonstrated when a song is played on the radio or performed as part of...Read more
Portrait image of Amit Sindhwani
Amit Sindhwani
Head of IPR, Usha International, India
Portrait image of Rajendra Kumar
Rajendra Kumar
Founding Partner RKR & Partners, RKR & Partners, India