LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

'Money or Monies worth? Beware the Transaction 'Cost' of Payment Systems'

July 2012RegulationUniversity

Abstract

The efficiency of business transactions has become increasingly important in the digital age, and an issue that has arguably evolved as a result of free-markets. Already, advances in technology has revolutionised the medium of exchange from tangible hard-cold cash, to an intangible medium, “digital data”. The current electronic payment systems (“PSs”) such as ATM, EFTPOS and credit cards are account-based PSs. Several new types of hardware-based PSs (e.g. Smart cards) and software-based PSs (e.g. DigiCash), have also developed. For instance, advancements in internet technology have enabled the “Egold” company in 1996 to trial private digital competing currencies. Recently, there has been increasing recognition by treasury groups who have lobbied for the development of a national based payment system – particularly in Australia, the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). This article will address the evolution and regulation of payment systems in select jurisdictions, but with a focus on the Australian position following the case of Visa International Inc v Reserve Bank of Australia. This case defined and highlighted the shifts that had taken place in a “payment system” (“PS”), both regulatory and structurally.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Sarah Hinchliffe

Barrister and Solicitor (HCA, Vic), The College of William and Mary, Australia

Related Papers

When the Referee Rewrites the Rulebook: Why FIFA's Governance Dilemma Matters to Every General Counsel
Governance Is Tested When Rules Become Inconvenient Every institution eventually encounters a defining moment. It is rarely triggered by a financial crisis, regulatory investigation or reputational scandal. Rather, it arises when...Read more
Portrait image of Jeffery Tan
Jeffery Tan
Group General Counsel & Chief Sustainability Officer, Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited, Singapore
Reforming Shareholders’ Meetings in Italy: Considerations on the Emerging Reform of the Consolidated Finance Act
While this article was in proof, the Italian Government approved the reform of the capital markets framework. At the time of writing, the final consolidated text, although in line with...Read more
Portrait image of Giuseppe Catalano
Giuseppe Catalano
Company Secretary and Head of Corporate Affairs, Assicurazioni Generali, Italy
Regulation Best Interest 5 Years Later
The adoption of Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”) marked one of the most consequential shifts in US securities regulation since the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It replaced the long-standing...Read more
Portrait image of Steven Trigili
Steven Trigili
Chief Compliance & Risk Officer, Garden State Securities, Inc., USA
Risk-Based Digital Compliance and Organisational Roles in EU Regulation
This article examines the organizational side of digital compliance in companies operating under key EU regulations (GDPR, the AI Act, NIS2, and the DSA). A common thread across these regimes...Read more
Portrait image of Andrej Savin
Andrej Savin
Professor, CBS LAW, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark