This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy

International In-house Counsel Journal logoInternational In-house Counsel Journal logo
Back to library search

'Money or Monies worth? Beware the Transaction 'Cost' of Payment Systems'

Abstract

The efficiency of business transactions has become increasingly important in the digital age, and an issue that has arguably evolved as a result of free-markets. Already, advances in technology has revolutionised the medium of exchange from tangible hard-cold cash, to an intangible medium, “digital data”. The current electronic payment systems (“PSs”) such as ATM, EFTPOS and credit cards are account-based PSs. Several new types of hardware-based PSs (e.g. Smart cards) and software-based PSs (e.g. DigiCash), have also developed. For instance, advancements in internet technology have enabled the “Egold” company in 1996 to trial private digital competing currencies. Recently, there has been increasing recognition by treasury groups who have lobbied for the development of a national based payment system – particularly in Australia, the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). This article will address the evolution and regulation of payment systems in select jurisdictions, but with a focus on the Australian position following the case of Visa International Inc v Reserve Bank of Australia. This case defined and highlighted the shifts that had taken place in a “payment system” (“PS”), both regulatory and structurally.

PLS LogoCopyright & permissions

Author

Portrait image of Sarah Hinchliffe
Sarah Hinchliffe
Barrister and Solicitor (HCA, Vic), The College of William and Mary, USA

Sarah is a Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of Australia and Supreme Court of Victoria, and has practical experience in the area of taxation law having worked for the Australian Taxation Office and in private legal practice. Sarah has been the Director of a boutique law firm, Princeton Legal (Hinchliffe Legal), since 2010. In addition to her work and engagement in the legal profession, Sarah is a Teaching Fellow (Teaching Specialist) in Taxation at the University of Melbourne. Sarah teaches in the postgraduate Masters program and has also taught at a postgraduate level at Monash University, Victoria University and for the Taxation Institute of Australia. Sarah is an Associate member of the Law Institute of Victoria and of the Taxation Institute of Australia. She is also a member of the Taxation and Revenue Committee and the Intellectual Property and Information Technology Committee at the Law Institute of Victoria. Sarah has been an external editor for the Law Institute Journal and she has been engaged by the Productivity Commission as a consultant. Her research interests are primarily in the areas of taxation law and intellectual property. In relation to the former, direct taxation, taxation compliance and international taxation; and in relation to the latter, Chinese, Canadian, European and American intellectual property law. Sarah has published in these respective areas, and she has also delivered seminars in the area of taxation (including USA, UK and Australian taxation laws) as part of the Asian Institute of International Financial Law seminar program at the University of Hong Kong.

Company

The College of William and Mary

The College of William and Mary, Mason School of Business: The Mason School of Business can lay claim to the spirit of revolution and take up the business of rebuilding the global economy by training the next generation of principled business leaders who will imagine the great business opportunities of the day and seize them. The entrepreneurial spirit that is the cornerstone of American business is as alive and as important as ever and lives on at the Mason School of Business.

Related Papers

Regulation Best Interest 5 Years Later
The adoption of Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”) marked one of the most consequential shifts in US securities regulation since the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It replaced the long-standing...Read more
Portrait image of Steven Trigili
Steven Trigili
Chief Compliance & Risk Officer, Garden State Securities, Inc., USA
Risk-Based Digital Compliance and Organisational Roles in EU Regulation
This article examines the organizational side of digital compliance in companies operating under key EU regulations (GDPR, the AI Act, NIS2, and the DSA). A common thread across these regimes...Read more
Portrait image of Andrej Savin
Andrej Savin
Professor, CBS LAW, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
The Era of Environmental Transparency: comparative analysis of green claims/greenwashing regulations in the European Union, United Kingdom, and United States (2024–2026)
This paper offers a strategic comparative analysis of the regulatory responses across the European Union (EU), the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (USA) during the crucial 2024–2026 triennium....Read more
Portrait image of Giuseppe Labbozzetta
Giuseppe Labbozzetta
Legal Counsel, Ferretti Group, Italy
“The US innovates, China replicates, Europe regulates” What is the role of general counsel in this scenario?
The US innovates, China replicates, and the EU regulates is a punchline in the policy debate; but beyond whether it is true or not there is certainly a tendency in...Read more
Portrait image of Alfonso Levote
Alfonso Levote
General Counsel & Investor Relations, Rosetti Marino S.p.A., Italy