LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Antitrust Enforcement of No Poach/Wage Fixing Agreements Has Accelerated: Managers and Human Resource Professionals Should be Aware of The Enhanced Criminal Penalties for These Types of Agreements

March 2022CompetitionAssociation

Abstract

Historically, when it came to antitrust enforcement, human resource (now commonly referred to as the ‘Talent Acquisition or ’Human Capital’ ) professionals were usually last on the list to receive any sort of antitrust compliance training. All that should have changed in 2016 when the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (”DOJ”) released its first round of guidance for human resource professionals. For maybe the first time in the long history of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, the human resource arena became a target for antitrust lawsuits. While that 2016 DOJ shot across the bow did receive some notoriety, a relatively passive, civil enforcement track record kept the application of antitrust to employment issues on the back burner. Enforcement efforts , either civil or criminal, of labor market restraints are clearly now on the front burner of the FTC, DOJ, state attorney generals as well as private plaintiff counsel.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Mark McCareins

General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA

Related Papers

Why the Silence on Vertical Price Restraints?
Despite pronouncements that a “New Wave” of antitrust enforcement is underway, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) have exercised collective silence...Read more
Portrait image of Mark McCareins
Mark McCareins
General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA
The Resale Price Maintenance (and Minimum Advertised Price) Conundrum Post-Leegin: State and Federal Law at a Crossroads
As one of the counsel for Respondent in the Supreme Court’s Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation decision, it has been difficult since 2007 to acknowledge that vertical...Read more
Portrait image of Mark McCareins
Mark McCareins
General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA
Product Distribution Challenge Recently Addressed by Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Landmark Decision Under the Robinson-Patman Act *
The passage of the Sherman Act by Congress in 1890 marked the onslaught of an antitrust revolution, which began in the United States and has now taken root in most...Read more
Portrait image of Mark McCareins
Mark McCareins
General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA
Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) at the Intersection Between EU Competition Law and the Freedom to Provide Services
This paper aims at examining some of the key questions that are essential to the daily work of Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) , who perform an important role by administering...Read more
Portrait image of Anita Huss-Ekerhult
Anita Huss-Ekerhult
General Counsel, IFRRO (International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations), Sweden