This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy

International In-house Counsel Journal logoInternational In-house Counsel Journal logo

Why the Silence on Vertical Price Restraints?

Abstract

Despite pronouncements that a “New Wave” of antitrust enforcement is underway, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) have exercised collective silence with regard to resale price maintenance (“RPM”). When the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Prods. v. PSKS, Inc. radically altered the Sherman Act Section 1 landscape on resale price maintenance (“RPM”) by abandoning the per se test used in Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Serv. Corp., the expectation was that this relaxed rule would allow manufacturers more leeway with respect to dealing with free riders and promoting goodwill and brand integrity. But since the Leegin decision in 2007, there has not been a surplus of empirical evidence presented as to whether these purported procompetitive benefits have actually transpired. Many of the States, however, have taken matters into their own hands, with or without any empirical data to support their views, to legislatively and prosecutorialy recast such claims as being subject to per se treatment in their respective jurisdictions. Meanwhile, antitrust counselors and their business clients have been left in a quandary in an attempt to maneuver the national patchwork of RPM (and minimum advertised price policies (“MAP”)) laws and decisions. While the FTC and DOJ have been quite prolific over the last two years in announcing their views on a wide variety of topics, some clarification in the area of RPM and MAP enforcement would be welcomed guidance by antitrust practitioners.

Read Paper

Author

Portrait image of R. Mark McCareins
R. Mark McCareins
General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA

R. Mark McCareins is the general counsel of the Metals Service Center Institute (www.msci.org). He also is a Clinical Professor in the Strategy Department of Northwestern University’s Kellogg Graduate School of Management where he teaches antitrust and business law. He practiced competition law with Winston and Strawn LLP for over thirty years where he was co-counsel for Respondent Spray-Rite Service Corp. in the referenced matter. He currently is a Clinical Professor in the Strategy Department at Kellogg.

Company

Metals Service Center Institute logo

Metals Service Center Institute

The Metals Service Center Institute ( www.msci.org) is the premier metals trade association in North America with nearly 300 members. MSCI is a leader in executive education and thought leadership for the metals industry.

Related Papers

Antitrust Enforcement of No Poach/Wage Fixing Agreements Has Accelerated: Managers and Human Resource Professionals Should be Aware of The Enhanced Criminal Penalties for These Types of Agreements
Historically, when it came to antitrust enforcement, human resource (now commonly referred to as the ‘Talent Acquisition or ’Human Capital’ ) professionals were usually last on the list to...Read more
Portrait image of R. Mark McCareins
R. Mark McCareins
General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA
The Resale Price Maintenance (and Minimum Advertised Price) Conundrum Post-Leegin: State and Federal Law at a Crossroads
As one of the counsel for Respondent in the Supreme Court’s Monsanto Company v. Spray-Rite Service Corporation decision, it has been difficult since 2007 to acknowledge that vertical...Read more
Portrait image of R. Mark McCareins
R. Mark McCareins
General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA
Product Distribution Challenge Recently Addressed by Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Landmark Decision Under the Robinson-Patman Act *
The passage of the Sherman Act by Congress in 1890 marked the onslaught of an antitrust revolution, which began in the United States and has now taken root in most...Read more
Portrait image of R. Mark McCareins
R. Mark McCareins
General Counsel, Metals Service Center Institute, USA
Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) at the Intersection Between EU Competition Law and the Freedom to Provide Services
This paper aims at examining some of the key questions that are essential to the daily work of Collective Management Organisations (CMOs) , who perform an important role by administering...Read more
Portrait image of Anita Huss-Ekerhult
Anita Huss-Ekerhult
General Counsel, IFRRO (International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations), Sweden