This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy

International In-house Counsel Journal logoInternational In-house Counsel Journal logo
Back to library search

Antitrust Damages Actions in Europe Pitfalls and Opportunities From a Corporation's Point of View

February 2012
CompetitionIT

Abstract

In recent years, the volume of private damages actions has increased substantially in the national courts of EU Member States. In England and Wales, for example, the number of private damages claims has risen from a handful of lawsuits five years ago to, at present, over 30 active cases based on around 20 different antitrust infringements. The same upward trend in the past five or six years has been reported in Germany, France and the Netherlands, amongst others. The growth in claims is driven in part by an initiative by the European Commission to facilitate antitrust damages actions and to raise awareness among potential claimants. This has included constant reminders of the availability of private damages actions in the Commission’s press releases announcing cartel decisions. The Commission has also published or commissioned a number of studies on the subject in the past six years. Most recently, the Commission has initiated consultations on some of the key obstacles facing claimants and has published a note on quantification of antitrust damages. More importantly to claimants, the level of Commission enforcement activity, particularly in the cartels sector, has increased substantially. In the years between 1990 and 1999, the Commission fined companies in 21 cartel cases. Between 2000 and 2009, this number had increased to 63. Commission infringement decisions are binding on national courts and contribute to the increase in litigation by removing the burden on claimants of proving violation of antitrust law by the defendants.

Author

Portrait image of Peter Bergson
Peter Bergson
General Counsel, Fingerprints, Sweden

Bergson, with background both in private practice and in-house roles, has 25 plus years of experience and has over the past 10 plus years served as General Counsel in international Fin Tech, Big Data and High Tech Corporations which have been both private equity owned and/or listed at a Nasdaq Exchange. Bergson’s legal experience is primarily focused on Transactions, Governance & Compliance and M&A related legal areas.

Company

Fingerprints logo

Fingerprints

Fingerprints develops biometric systems comprising sensors, algorithms, software and packaging technoligies. The success is based on product development at the cutting edge of technology, which results in world-leading products in terms of security, convenience and performance. The current product range consists largely of fingerprint sensors and customers are primarily manufacturers of smartphones and tablets, where the company is market leading. As the use of biometric solutions increases, Fingerprints is working to broaden their offer by using different biometric techniques, or modalities, and to identify other market segments where the solutions can be used, such as smart cards, PCs, automotive and online devices (IoT). The Fingerprints share is listed on Nasdaq Stockholm (FING B).

Related Papers

E-Commerce. Nearly a year with the EU Geo-blocking Regulation
Portrait image of Ivan Lebedev
Ivan Lebedev
Legal Counsel EMEA, Acer European Holdings SA, Switzerland
Meeting the Challenges of European Union Anti-trust Compliance with Technical Innovation
To paraphrase an old adage – “God could not be everywhere all the time, that’s why he invented regulators”! However, as most legislators and regulation draftsmen would have it, their...Read more
Portrait image of David Kemp
David Kemp
xecutive Director of Legal Policy, HP Autonomy, UK
Applicability of Deal Value Threshold in Share Swap Transactions in India
The Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) has embarked on a transformative journey to enhance its merger control framework, with pivotal changes taking effect on 10 September 2024. These reforms arise...Read more
Portrait image of Prateek Sethi
Prateek Sethi
Associate Vice President - Legal, Bharti Airtel Limited, India
Payback Time: Trump and EU’s “Exorbitant” Fines vs US Tech Companies
The election of Donald Trump for a second term of the US Presidency is of considerable concern to the European Union (EU), NATO, and states worldwide in general owing to...Read more
Portrait image of Roy Girasa
Roy Girasa
Professor of Law, Pace University, USA