This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy

International In-house Counsel Journal logoInternational In-house Counsel Journal logo
Back to library search

How Much Value is Your Company Losing? Implementing Effective Intellectual Property Management

Abstract

Increasingly most of the value of a company today can be attributed to its intellectual property and other intangible assets. Without effective management of these assets, including governance committees, intellectual property audits, invention disclosure processes, and trade secret registries, much of this value can be overlooked, poorly leveraged, or even lost. Implementation of effective intellectual property management is not only good business, but increasingly a requirement for accurate financial reporting and compliance. 1. Introduction Three years ago I was hired as in-house counsel responsible for intellectual property for a recently spun-off division of Bayer Healthcare. The new company, Talecris Biotherapeutics, was respectably large and established with over 2,000 employees and one billion dollars (USD) worth of world-wide biopharmaceutical sales. However, in many respects it was a start-up forced to create from scratch functions historically handled by its former parent company. This deficiency was most notably true with respect to intellectual property management. I became aware of our lack of intellectual property infrastructure when, soon after joining Talecris, I was handed a list of twenty patents whose maintenance fees were coming due and asked 'which were worth the expense?' That an attorney alone would be given this task underscored the need to make some changes. What followed from this request was a series of initiatives that have greatly increased awareness of intellectual property throughout the organization (including a 300% increase in invention disclosures), improved the decision making surrounding intellectual property resources and assets, and made it easier for the chief financial officer and the chief executive to stand by their public disclosures of company value.

Author

Portrait image of Gunnar Wieboldt
Gunnar Wieboldt
General Counsel & VP of Corporate Development, Wearality Corporation, USA

Career mostly spent in-house in a variety of settings such as biopharma, universities, and high technology companies, including Talecris Biopharmaceuticals (now Grifols), UNC at Chapel Hill, and most recently, Wearality Corporation (VR/AR optics VC backed start up). As a corporate generalist had a wide range of responsibilities but always with a particular emphasis on managing and exploiting the intellectual property assets of the company or university and have designed and implemented novel and high impact IP management systems. Earned JD from Harvard Law School, MBA from Duke University, and BA from University of Rochester. Served as an officer in the United States Marine Corps.

Company

Wearality Corporation logo

Wearality Corporation

Wearality Corporation is a venture backed virtual and augmented reality optics company based in Silicon Valley and Orlando, FL built on platform technologies exclusively licensed from Lockheed Martin.

Related Papers

Patent Strategies for Attenuated Pathogen Vaccines
Malaria is a major health concern for people traveling to and living in malaria-endemic areas, causing 249 million clinical cases and 608,000 deaths in 2022, numbers essentially unchanged over the...Read more
Portrait image of David Dolberg
David Dolberg
Senior Director of Intellectual Property, Sanaria Inc., USA
Ways to Avoid Having your Patents Cellected*
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit caused frustrations when it decided to affirm the U.S. Patent Office’s findings that claims in four patents were unpatentable because they are...Read more
Portrait image of Tom Irving
Tom Irving
Partner, Marbury Law Group, USA
Portrait image of Xiaoguang Michelle Gao
Xiaoguang Michelle Gao
Associate VP - Assistant General Patent Counsel , Eli Lilly and Company, USA
Portrait image of Michelle E. O'Brien
Michelle E. O'Brien
Partner, Marbury Law Group, USA
Section 112 Requirements for Life Sciences Patents
35 U.S.C. §112(a) of the US Patent Act is one of the integral parts of the quid pro quo patent system that balances the benefit of disclosure of the invention...Read more
Portrait image of Anagha Tendulkar
Anagha Tendulkar
In-house Patent Counsel, Cipla, India
A Current Look at the State of Inequitable Conduct and Other Equitable Concerns
Inequitable conduct is an “equitable defense to patent infringement that, if proved, bars enforcement of a patent. ” Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co. , 649 F. 3d 1276,...Read more
Portrait image of Tom Irving
Tom Irving
Partner, Marbury Law Group, USA
Portrait image of Xiaoguang Michelle Gao
Xiaoguang Michelle Gao
Associate VP - Assistant General Patent Counsel , Eli Lilly and Company, USA
Portrait image of Stacy Lewis
Stacy Lewis
Law Clerk, Finnegan, USA
Portrait image of Jordan Cowger
Jordan Cowger
Finnegan, USA
Portrait image of Melissa Santos
Melissa Santos
Finnegan, USA