This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy

International In-house Counsel Journal logoInternational In-house Counsel Journal logo
Back to library search

The Real ID Act and the Public Administration of Global Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Policies

October 2008
IdentityGeneral

Abstract

As a former prosecutor, I understood that each crime I prosecuted had certain “elements,” which must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in order to secure a conviction. The “elements” of each crime became a pair of “reading glasses” for me. As an investigator began to pitch his case, I would put on my elements-reading glasses and look for where the evidence would fit into the charge we were considering. The first element of every crime is proving the identity of the defendant. It is not enough to prove that a crime was committed. The prosecutor must also prove that the defendant sitting in the courtroom is the person who committed every element of that crime. Prosecutors typically use driver’s licenses and state identification cards to prove identity by linking the defendant in the courtroom to the name on the indictment. That is why the Real ID Act[i] (also known as §§201-205 of Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006 (Public Law 109-234)) is of such significance to law enforcement. The Real ID Act will convert today’s simple drivers’ licenses into governmentally-imposed biometric cards. These cards will tie distinguishing human anatomy to a single, confirmed biographical record. The Real ID Act prohibits federal agencies from accepting a state-issued driver’s license or identification card (presented for official purposes)[ii] that does not meet its issuance standards. Applicants will have to prove that they are U.S. citizens, nationals, or have lawful immigration status to be eligible for either card.

PLS LogoCopyright & permissions

Author

Bart Bevers
Attorney, Law Offices of Bart Bevers, USA

Bart is a former prosecutor and the former Inspector General for HHSC in Texas. Having run a large law enforcement agency with several hundred employees has given Bart valuable perspective on how the government builds cases against his clients. Bart handles a wide range of criminal defense cases for clients throughout Collin, Dallas and Tarrant counties, as well as administrative engagements for healthcare providers throughout the State of Texas. Bart Bevers is a skillful and experienced trial attorney. He is highly knowledgeable in criminal defense law and health care law, as well as other various areas of law. Bart has successfully handled hundreds of cases throughout his career. Bart works very closely with his clients to assess the merits of the engagement, and develop a full-case strategy, estimate the costs to be incurred, arrive at a financial plan that takes into account the size and complexity of the engagement, and the client's resources.

Company

Law Offices of Bart Bevers logo

Law Offices of Bart Bevers

The Law Offices of Bart Bevers, P.C. serves clients throughout the State of Texas. As a full-service defense practice, Bart is prepared to handle every aspect of your criminal or administrative case. In criminal cases this can involve activities from bail arrangements to grand jury hearings, to criminal trials. In administrative engagements this can involve investigative assistance, review of compliance plans, program integrity policies & procedures, or legal representation with audits, reviews and investigations. Whether you are facing felony or misdemeanor criminal charges, or administrative allegations by government regulators, I have the experience, skill and resources to effectively handle your case.

Related Papers

The AI Readiness Gap: Why Your Contract Data Isn't Ready for AI (And What to Do About It)
Something familiar is playing out inside legal departments right now. A new category of technology arrives with credible promises, vendors multiply overnight, and professionals rush to adopt new tools before...Read more
Portrait image of Cat Carroll
Cat Carroll
Head of Legal Operations, iManage LLC, USA
Between Board Neutrality and Control: Reimagining Hostile Takeover Defences in India with Lessons from Delaware and Asia-Pacific
Hostile takeovers have traditionally played only a limited role in the mergers and acquisitions landscape in India. This is attributable primarily to the ownership structure of most listed Indian companies,...Read more
Portrait image of Vikas Agarwal
Vikas Agarwal
Co-Founder, LegaLogic Consulting, India
Portrait image of Neha Deshmukh
Neha Deshmukh
Legal Advisor, LegaLogic Consulting, India
“But I Wore the Lemon Juice”: AI, Confidence, Confidentiality, and the Novel Risks Facing In-House Counsel
Contemporary lessons for international in-house counsel can emerge from strange places. In 1995, two Pittsburgh bank robbers applied lemon juice to their faces, confidently believing it would blur their appearance...Read more
Portrait image of Todd Krieger
Todd Krieger
Director of International Transactions and Senior Counsel, InterSystems Corporation, USA
From Gatekeeper to Process Architect: The New Role of In-house Counsel in AI Governance
In an era of accelerated advancement in AI technology, dynamic and variable global legislative approaches to AI risk management, and unrelenting commercial pressure for agile AI adoption, the role of...Read more
Portrait image of Cam-Van (Vannie) Nguyen
Cam-Van (Vannie) Nguyen
Senior Managing Counsel, Office of the Chief Legal & Regulatory Officer, Align Technology, Inc., USA
Portrait image of Karen Jaenike
Karen Jaenike
Legal Director, Strategic Commercial Affairs, Align Technology, Inc., USA