LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

Conflicts of Interests in Shareholders’ Meetings of Brazilian Corporations: the Legal Framework according to Scholars and the Case Law of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission

June 2018RegulationProperty

Abstract

The issue addressed in this paper relates to the interpretation, according to Brazilian scholars and the case law of the decision board of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission, of the provisions governing conflicts of interests in shareholders’ meeting of Brazilian corporations. More specifically, this paper envisions to answer how the rules regarding conflicts of interests in shareholders’ meetings of Brazilian corporations should be interpreted and applied. To that end, we will analyse opinions of scholars in respect to the interpretation of the caput and first paragraph of article 115 of Law n. 6,404/76, as well as two cases judged by the decision board of the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission. After a brief introduction on the legal background in Brazil and abroad on the matter, this paper specifically analyses the interpretation of the caput and the first paragraph of article 115 of Law n. 6,404/76. Articles 116 and 117 of Law 6,404/76, which establish specific duties of the controlling shareholders and complement the legal framework regarding the conflicts of interests in Brazilian corporations, will not be analysed. Key words: Conflicts of Interests, Abuse of Voting Rights, Undue Advantages, Private Benefits, Brazilian corporations, Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Juliana Bastianello Baldin Martins

Managing Director - Legal Affairs, GTIS Partners, Brazil

Related Papers

Practice and Procedure in a Representative State Court System
This article examines civil practice and procedure at the pre-trial level under the “best practices” rules of the courts of the State of New Jersey. Although each of the fifty...Read more
Portrait image of Joseph Aronds
Joseph Aronds
Vice President and Chief Litigation and Trial Counsel, Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc., USA
When the Referee Rewrites the Rulebook: Why FIFA's Governance Dilemma Matters to Every General Counsel
Governance Is Tested When Rules Become Inconvenient Every institution eventually encounters a defining moment. It is rarely triggered by a financial crisis, regulatory investigation or reputational scandal. Rather, it arises when...Read more
Portrait image of Jeffery Tan
Jeffery Tan
Group General Counsel & Chief Sustainability Officer, Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited, Singapore
Reforming Shareholders’ Meetings in Italy: Considerations on the Emerging Reform of the Consolidated Finance Act
While this article was in proof, the Italian Government approved the reform of the capital markets framework. At the time of writing, the final consolidated text, although in line with...Read more
Portrait image of Giuseppe Catalano
Giuseppe Catalano
Company Secretary and Head of Corporate Affairs, Assicurazioni Generali, Italy
Regulation Best Interest 5 Years Later
The adoption of Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”) marked one of the most consequential shifts in US securities regulation since the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It replaced the long-standing...Read more
Portrait image of Steven Trigili
Steven Trigili
Chief Compliance & Risk Officer, Garden State Securities, Inc., USA