This website uses cookies

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy

International In-house Counsel Journal logoInternational In-house Counsel Journal logo
Back to library search

Competition Law and Policy in Pakistan

Abstract

Since, the Ordinance was placed on the statute book in November 2007 through a presidential Ordinance; it has received more than its fair share of criticism. Business leaders and other stakeholders in the country have, during the course of stakeholder dialogues organized by the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP), raised concerns on the need for the new competition regime in these trying economic times and its continuity; while legal advisers have raised challenges to the constitutional vires and other substantive and procedural aspects of the Ordinance.

Author

Rahat Hassan
Member (Legal), Pakistan's Competition Commission, Pakistan

Ms. Rahat Kaunain Hassan is Member (Legal) at the Competition Commission of Pakistan. She received L.L.B degree from the University of the Punjab and the L.L.M degree from King's College London. She is a recipient of the coveted Britannia Chevening Scholarship and specialized in the Law of International Finance and International Business transactions. She founded and was a Partner at the Law Firm in Islamabad, Hassan Kaunain Nafees, Legal Practitioners & Advisers, and before joining the Commission had over 15 years of practice as a corporate and commercial lawyer. She has also been a partner at the international law firm, Amhurst Brown, in Islamabad and has also served at the Securities & Exchange Commission of Pakistan as General Counsel/Executive Director (Law & Securities Market Division).

Company

Pakistan's Competition Commission

Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) was established on 2nd October, 2007 under the Competition Ordinance, 2007 (the “Ordinance”) as a quasi judicial, quasi regulatory, law enforcement agency having a specialized umbrella jurisdiction over the economy as a whole. The Ordinance repealed Monopolies Restrictive Trade Practices (Control and Prevention) Ordinance, 1970 (MRTPO) and replaced the old style Monopoly Control Authority (MCA) by CCP, a modern agency — a five Members collegiate body. Major aim of this Ordinance is to provide for a legal framework to create a business environment based on healthy competition towards improving economic efficiency, developing competitiveness and protecting consumers from anti-competitive practices. Although this organization has been established only recently (almost sixteen months old) it has been very proactive; CCP activities in such a short span include: • Some landmark decisions re: Pakistan Banking Association and six banks penalized for cartelization, a leading telecom company found guilty of SIM locking and product tying, an educational institution found guilty of tying computer sales to admissions, Fauji Fertilizer/Fauji Bin Qasim — delinked by ensuring appointment of independent directors, Institute of Chartered Accountant of Pakistan — ICAP penalized for minimum fee fixing, stock exchanges penalized for discriminatory floor imposition, • Important proceedings underway re: Karachi Stock Exchange abuse of dominance, National Refinery’s refusal to deal, cement manufacturers cartelization, Karachi Port Trust’s collusive tendering, and Secretary APCMA obstruction matter. Cartelization and exclusionary conduct in Liquid Petroleum Gas sector, Newspapers cartelization, deceptive advertising by four banks, deceptive advertising by two cellular companies. • Extensive and focused advocacy efforts (assisted by a small DFID/WB grant) CCP has held six seminars (two with international competition experts) and innumerable bilateral/roundtable deliberations with sector-specific regulators, lawyers, business leaders, and professional bodies.

Related Papers

Antitrust Matters in Takeovers!!
The elemental axiomatic truth about jurisprudence and strategic management in takeover settings is that a crucial area that lies at the intersection is a least understood area. Antitrust issues, as...Read more
Portrait image of undefined
What Extraterritorial Application of Competition Law Means for MNCs
Several competition law regimes around the world, including the EU and the USA, have adopted rules allowing their respective authorities to apply domestic competition law to activities occurring outside of...Read more
Portrait image of Michael Ristaniemi
Michael Ristaniemi
Legal Counsel, Metsäliitto Cooperative, Finland
Applicability of Deal Value Threshold in Share Swap Transactions in India
The Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) has embarked on a transformative journey to enhance its merger control framework, with pivotal changes taking effect on 10 September 2024. These reforms arise...Read more
Portrait image of Prateek Sethi
Prateek Sethi
Associate Vice President - Legal, Bharti Airtel Limited, India
Payback Time: Trump and EU’s “Exorbitant” Fines vs US Tech Companies
The election of Donald Trump for a second term of the US Presidency is of considerable concern to the European Union (EU), NATO, and states worldwide in general owing to...Read more
Portrait image of Roy Girasa
Roy Girasa
Professor of Law, Pace University, USA