LoginSubscribe Now
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
International In-house Counsel Journal Logo
  • Home
  • Business Sectors
  • Areas of Law
  • Editorial Board
  • Write a Paper
  • Subscribe
  • Books
  • Reports
  • Back Issues
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
© 2026 International In-house Counsel Journal Ltd. | ISSN 1754-0607 | Picture Credits: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors
Back to library search

The Times Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey 2019

December 2019Expert WitnessManagement

Abstract

The Times and Bond Solon Annual Expert Witness Survey 2019* was conducted online from 13th September 2019 to 30th September 2019. 569 experts completed the survey making it one of the largest expert witness surveys conducted in the UK. The report provides the analysis of the results from the survey. Let’s look at some of the findings. During 2019, there were several cases that exposed some expert witnesses who have not understood the basic requirements of the role of an expert witness. The survey asked if judges have the power to permanently disqualify such experts. Experts clearly want all experts to understand their role and agree that those who do not have the necessary understanding should not continue. Nearly 60% agree that judges should permanently disqualify such experts. It is so basic that an expert’s duty is to the court and not the instructing party that it seems incredible that some experts still do not understand the principle. However, some experts do not and continue to be “hired guns” as Lord Woolf memorably described them in his report, Access to Justice. Instructing solicitors also need to be cognisant of the principle as the survey found that experts continue to be asked or feel pressurised to change their report by an instructing party in a way that damages impartiality. Interestingly, 44% of respondents said they had come across experts who profess expertise in an area in which either they are not qualified or does not warrant expertise.

Subscribe to reador
PLS Logo Copyright & permissions

Author

Mark Solon

Managing Director & Solicitor, Wilmington, UK

Related Papers

Third Party Litigation Funding and Lawyer Ethics
This article considers the growth of third-party litigation funding (TPLF) in the United States and the ethical implications for lawyers who represent clients who want and/or need third party funding...Read more
Portrait image of Michael Ambrosio
Michael Ambrosio
Professor of Law, Seton Hall University School of Law, USA
Whether Aid/Aide from National and/or International Organisations be a Factor for Developing Socio-Economic Cohesiveness of the Peoples Living in the Country Concerned
Most of the States, in particular, those in the developing parts of the world seek and receive “aid” as a supplement to the amount already approved by the foreign government...Read more
Portrait image of Professor Charles Chatterjee
Professor Charles Chatterjee
Senior Research Fellow, Global Policy Institute, UK
Negotiating Commercial Agreements
Home advantage is an oft-quoted adage which might work well in the sports world, but might be a false friend in negotiations. In blunt terms, it’s really hard to walk...Read more
Portrait image of Christopher Parr
Christopher Parr
Director, The Legal Director, UK
Don’t Waste All your Lawyer’s Time on Legal Matters
Hire In-House General Counsel, Because You are Adding Four Key Workhorses All in One 1. A broad technical expert in all the engineering and science aspects of your company. 2. An unconventional...Read more
Portrait image of Paul Grahovac
Paul Grahovac
Building Envelope Codes, Standards and Field Support, General Counsel, Director of New Business Develo, PROSOCO Inc, USA